Skip to content


Your cart is empty



Section 119 of The Non-Profit Corporations Act provides:

119 The articles or bylaws may provide that the directors, members or any committee of directors or members of a corporation have power to discipline a member or to terminate the membership interest of a member and, where the articles or bylaws do, the circumstances in which that power may be exercised and the manner of its exercise is to be set out in the articles or bylaws of the corporation.

A person is entitled to a fair hearing before he or she may be disciplined by a corporation. This policy provides a guide to suitable bylaws for discipline procedure. Each organization should ensure that its bylaws provide for a fair hearing in the event that discipline is necessary.

This policy calls for two committees to be established:

The responsibilities of the Investigation Committee are:

(a) To gather information relating to disputes;

(b) To take any practical steps that may to resolve disputes without the need for a hearing; and,

(c) When a hearing is necessary, to fairly present all relevant information to a hearing committee by means of evidence acceptable to the hearing committee.

The responsibility of the Hearing Committee is to provide a fair hearing.

Characteristics of a fair hearing include:

(a) Notice of the hearing;

(b) Knowledge of the case to be met;

(c) A right to hear or see all information provided to and considered by the arbitrator;

(d) An opportunity to provide information and arguments;

(e) If an oral hearing is conducted (rather than a hearing based solely on written submissions and documents), the right to question witnesses;

(f) Unbiased arbitrators who will hear and consider all relevant information.

Organizations should consider the need to obtain legal advice in preparing bylaws suitable for their needs.

Table Of Contents

  1. Dispute Resolution Bodies (Investigation Committee and Hearing Committee)
  2. Misconduct
  3. Referral and review of complaints and incidents
  4. Investigation
  5. Interim suspension of member
  6. Acting upon the Investigator’s report
  7. Hearings
  8. Procedure
  9. Disciplinary Powers
  10. Deference to Other Authorities
  11. Time for Completion
  12. Appeal to the Board
  13. Effect of Expulsion or Suspension
  14. Reinstatement
  15. Conflict of Interest or Bias
1. Dispute Resolution Bodies

Two bodies will be appointed to resolve disputes, whether arising from allegations of harassment or other misconduct, team selection, employment or other issues.

1.1 Investigation Committee

1) The investigation committee is established consisting of a chairperson and such other persons as the chairperson may appoint.

2) The board shall appoint the chairperson of the investigation committee.

3) The chairperson may appoint members to the committee from time to time for the purpose of that appointee serving as investigator of a specific complaint.

4) Members of the hearing committee and members of the board are not eligible to be a member of the investigation committee.

1.2 Hearing Committee

1) The Samir Jain , upon receipt of a report from the investigation committee which recommends that a hearing be conducted, shall appoint a hearing committee consisting of one or three persons.

2) Members of the investigation committee and members of the board are not eligible to be appointed as a member of the hearing committee.

3) If the Samir Jain considers it appropriate to do so, the Samir Jain shall appoint to the hearing committee a person nominated by each party to the dispute.

2. Misconduct

2.1 Any matter, conduct or thing, whether or not disgraceful or dishonourable, is misconduct if:

1) It is contrary to the best interests of MISS JO or of any participant (player, coach, official or spectator).

2) It is contrary to the bylaws of MISS JO

3) It is contrary to any Code of Conduct established by MISS JO

4) It is a failure to comply with an order pursuant to this dispute resolution policy by the Samir Jain , the board or a hearing committee.

3. Referral And Review Of Complaints And Incidents

3.1 Complaints must be made to the Samir Jain promptly and within the time guidelines set by policy of the board.

3.2 The Samir Jain may extend the time for submission of a complaint notwithstanding the expiration of the time set by board guidelines.

3.3 The Samir Jain shall refer the following matters to the chairperson of the investigation committee:

1) A complaint alleging that a player, team, coach, official, parent/guardian or spectator is guilty of misconduct.

2) On the request of the board, any incident in which misconduct may have occurred.

3) A complaint relating to team selection.

4) Any other request for resolution of a dispute arising from or relating to the activities of the organization.

3.4 The chairperson of the investigation committee may require that a complaint be stated in writing.

3.5 If the chairperson of the investigation committee is satisfied that the complaint is not valid or does not raise an issue of misconduct or is trivial, frivolous or vexatious in nature, the chairperson shall advise the complainant and thereafter shall take no further action in relation to that complaint.

3.6 Where the chairperson has not dismissed a complaint pursuant to

3.5, the chairperson shall appoint one or more members of the investigation committee as investigator of the complaint or incident.

3.7 The chairperson may appoint himself or herself as the investigator or as one of the investigators.

4. Investigation

4.1 The investigator shall:

1) Review the complaint or the request

2) Make such inquiries as necessary to determine the circumstances of the complaint or incident, which may include:

  1. a) sending a copy of summary of the complaint to those named in the complaint, those making the complaint or to any witnesses with a request that they respond in writing to the allegations by a date set by the investigator;
  2. b) communicating with or interviewing persons involved in the incident or whose conduct is the subject of the complaint;

and c) communicating with or interviewing other persons who may have relevant information.

3) Extend the investigation to include misconduct in any other incident that comes to the attention of the investigator in the course of the investigation.

4) When practical to do so, encourage the parties to resolve the dispute directly.

5) With the agreement of the parties, arrange mediation of the dispute.

4.2 On completion of the investigation, the investigator shall make a written report to the Samir Jain recommending:

1) That the Samir Jain appoint a hearing committee to hear and resolve the dispute or to hear the charges, as the case may be;

  1. 2) That no further action be taken with respect to the matter investigated because:
  2. a) the matter has been resolved between the parties,
  3. b) no further action is warranted on the facts of the case.

4.3 The charge set out in a written report may relate to any matter disclosed during the investigation.

4.4 A report signed by a majority of the investigation committee is a decision of investigators

5. Interim Suspension Of Member

5.1 In cases of alleged serious misconduct or if there is a risk of physical or emotional harm to other persons, the investigator may submit written reasons to Samir Jain recommending that, pending the outcome of an investigation, a player, team, coach, official, parent/guardian or spectator under investigation:

1) be suspended from participation or

2) be allowed to continue participation subject to conditions or restrictions.

5.2 Upon receiving the written recommendations of the investigator, Samir Jain shall:

1) If satisfied that continued participation is inappropriate in the circumstances, may order suspension of involvement in organization activities or impose other less restrictive conditions pending the recommendations of the hearing committee.

2) If satisfied that continued participation is appropriate in the circumstances, decline the recommendation of the investigator.

5.3 An order of suspension or the imposition of conditions on a member, pending the recommendations of the hearing committee, shall:

1) terminate 30 days after the date of the suspension or imposition of conditions, unless renewed or revised by Samir Jain upon a further written recommendation by the investigator.

2) be superseded by the recommendations of the hearing committee

6. Acting Upon The Investigator’s Report

6.1 If the investigation committee recommends no further action on a complaint, Samir Jain shall provide a copy of the investigation committee’s reasons for that recommendation to the person or person(s):

1) whose conduct is the subject of the complaint

2) who initiated the complaint

6.2 If the investigation committee is of the opinion that a hearing committee should be appointed, Samir Jain shall appoint a hearing committee.

6.3 Samir Jain shall report a decision not to appoint a hearing committee to the next meeting of the board.

7. Hearings

7.1 The hearing committee shall conduct a fair hearing of the charge or dispute reported in the investigation committee’s report.

7.2 At the request of the hearing committee, Samir Jain shall communicate the time and place of the hearing and any other pertinent information to the parties.

8. Hearing Procedure

8.1 In disputes of a nature that the hearing committee considers to be minor, the hearing may be conducted in writing. The parties shall be:

(a) informed that a hearing committee has been established;

(b) informed of the charge or dispute to be heard;

(c) provided with a copies of the dispute resolution policy;

(d) invited, within a time specified by the committee, to make written submissions of any information or arguments relevant to the deliberations of the committee;

(e) informed of the findings of the hearing committee;

8.2 If the hearing committee does not consider the dispute to be minor, the parties shall have a right to be heard in person:

1) At least 3 days before the date of the hearing the parties shall be:

(a) informed that a hearing committee has been established;

(b) informed of the charge or dispute to be heard;

(c) provided with a copy of the dispute resolution policy.

2) The hearing committee shall hear the charge or dispute and shall determine whether or not the accused is guilty of misconduct or rule on the issues in dispute.

3) Parties may be represented by legal counsel at their own expense.

4) There is to be full right:

  1. a) to examine, cross-examine and re-examine all witnesses
  2. b) to present evidence in defence and reply.

5) Where a party fails to attend the hearing, the hearing committee may proceed in his or her absence.

6) If, during the course of a hearing, the evidence shows that the accused may be guilty of misconduct different from or in addition to any misconduct specified in the charge, the hearing committee shall adjourn the hearing for any period that the committee considers sufficient to give the accused an opportunity to prepare a defence to the amended charge, unless the respondent consents to continue the hearing.

7) The hearing committee may accept any evidence that it considers appropriate and is not bound by rules of law concerning evidence.

8) The hearing committee may accept a record of a criminal conviction or the written reasons for a decision imposing discipline by any other organization as evidence of the conduct giving rise to the conviction or discipline.

9) On its own initiative or at the request of any party, the hearing committee may restrict the public from the hearing. The hearing committee shall exclude the public if the committee is of the opinion that an open hearing will unduly violate the privacy of any person.

10) The deliberations of the hearing committee shall be conducted in private, and no person who is not a member of the committee shall be present.

8.3 The hearing committee shall give written reasons for its decisions and for any discipline imposed. Copies shall be provided to the parties and to the board.

9. Disciplinary Powers

9.1 Where the hearing committee finds a person guilty of misconduct, it may make one or more of the following orders, in writing:

1) An order that the person(s) be expelled from the organization

2) An order that the person(s) be suspended from the organization for a specified period

3) An order that the person(s) be suspended pending the satisfaction and completion of any conditions specified in the order

4) An order that the respondent may continue to participate only under conditions specified in the order

5) An order reprimanding the respondent

6) Any other order that the hearing committee considers just.

9.2 In making an order the hearing committee shall take into consideration:

1) The age, experience and maturity of the person(s)

2) The nature of the misconduct;

3) Any information which, in the opinion of the committee is reliable and relevant to the determination of an appropriate order, including;

  1. a) previous misconduct of the respondent, regardless of whether or not that misconduct was the subject of discipline
  2. b) the character of the respondent
10. Deference To Other Authorities

10.1 Where the Samir Jain, chairperson of the investigation committee or the chairperson of the hearing committee believes that the person(s) whose conduct is being investigated may be guilty of a criminal offence, that person may refer the matter to an appropriate authority.

11. Time For Completion

11.1 The investigation, hearing and decision of the hearing committee shall be completed as soon as practical in the circumstances of the complaint.

11.2 The board may set time guidelines for any matters that the board considers appropriate, including the time for complaints to be made to the Samir Jain , and the time for completion of steps in the hearing process.

11.3 In deciding an appeal from a decision of the hearing committee, the board may consider the failure to comply with time guidelines.

12. Appeal To The Board

12.1 A person(s) may appeal the decision or any order of the investigation committee or the hearing committee to the organization board by serving a written notice of appeal within __ days of receipt of the decision or order where:

1) The member has been found guilty of misconduct by the hearing committee;

2) The person is subject to a discipline order;

3) The person(s) who initiated the complaint was advised that no further action would be taken.

12.2 The written notice shall state the grounds of appeal.

12.3 The Samir Jain shall not participate in the hearing of an appeal.

12.4 No board member shall participate in the hearing of an appeal if:

1) The board member has a conflict of interest or is biased

2) If there is any reasonable basis on which it may appear that the board member may have a conflict of interest or may be biased.

12.5 The participation by a board member in any step of the investigation process prior to the hearing of the appeal shall be deemed to create the appearance of a bias.

12.6 The participation by a board member in any step of the investigation or hearing process prior to the hearing of the appeal shall be deemed to create the appearance of a bias.

12.7 If all board members are unable to participate in the hearing, the board shall appoint a committee of not more than three persons to hear the appeal.

12.8 On hearing an appeal the board or the appointed committee may:

11) Dismiss the appeal

12) Quash the finding of guilt

13) Direct further inquiries by the investigation committee or appoint a new investigation committee to reinvestigate the matter

14) Direct a new hearing or further inquiries by the hearing committee or appoint a new hearing committee to rehear the matter

15) Vary the order of the hearing committee.

13. Effect Of Expulsion Or Suspension

13.1 When a person(s) is expelled or suspended from the organization pursuant to the policy, that person(s) is not eligible to serve any function within the organization or attend any organization activities.

14. Reinstatement

14.1 A person who has been expelled may apply to the board for reinstatement.

14.2 Subject to the bylaws, on receipt of an application of reinstatement the board shall review the application and, if in the opinion of the board the application disclosed information which may justify reinstatement, the board may investigate the application by taking any steps it considers necessary.

14.3 On completion of its review, the board may:

1) Where it is satisfied that the person’s subsequent conduct and any other facts warrant reinstatement, direct that the person be reinstated under any terms and conditions that the board considers appropriate.

2) Refuse to reinstate the person.

15. Conflict Of Interest Or Bias

15.1 In the event that any member of either the investigation committee or the hearing committee, other than one nominated by the parties, has a conflict of interest or is biased, that person shall declare the conflict or bias and the Samir Jain shall appoint a replacement.

15.2 In the event of a conflict of interest on the part of a board member, that member shall not participate in the decision of the board.